Famous quotes
Quotes by famous people, credited to who said them. Your own quotes must not match any of these. More are added all the time. 1,158,808 quotes Who coined it · How we decide
EnglishItalianoPolskiעבריתFrançaisPortuguêsفارسیEspañol中文РусскийDeutschالعربيةहिन्दी日本語ΕλληνικάLatina
Paul Cohen
6 quotes
“To the average mathematician who merely wants to know that his work is securely based, the most appealing choice is to avoid difficulties by means of Hilbert's program. Here one regards mathematics as a formal game and one is only concerned with the question of consistency.”
Paul Cohen (1934–2007) first seen 1971 wikiquote, CC BY-SA 4.0 source
Recorded in: p. 11 of "Comments on the foundations of set theory." In Axiomatic set theory, pp. 9-15. Providence (RI). American Mathematical Society, 1971.
“However, in all honesty, I must say that one must essentially forget that all proofs are transcribed in this formal language. In order to think productively, one must use all the intuitive and informal methods of reasoning at one's disposal. At the very end one must check that no errors have been committed; but in practice set theory is treated as any other branch of mathematics. The reason that we can do this is that we will never speak about proofs but only about models.”
Paul Cohen (1934–2007) first seen 1071 wikiquote, CC BY-SA 4.0 source
Recorded in: p. 1078 of "The discovery of forcing." Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics 32, no. 4 (2002): 1071–1100.
“The theorem of Löwenheim–Skolem was the first truly important discovery about formal systems in general, and it remains probably the most basic. It is not a negative result at all, but plays an important role in many situations. For example, in Gödel's proof of the consistency of the Continuum Hypothesis, the fact that the hypothesis holds in the universe of constructible sets is essentially an application of the theorem.”
Paul Cohen (1934–2007) said by 2007 at the latest wikiquote, CC BY-SA 4.0 source
“The object of mathematics is to discover "true" theorems. We shall use the term "valid" to describe statements formed according to certain rules and then shall discuss how this notion compares with the intuitive idea of "true".”
Paul Cohen (1934–2007) said by 2007 at the latest wikiquote, CC BY-SA 4.0 source
“It is now known that the truth or falsity of the continuum hypothesis and other related conjectures cannot be determined by set theory as we know it today. This state of affairs regarding a classical and presumably well-posed problem must certainly appear rather unsatisfactory to the average mathematician. One is tempted to look more closely and perhaps more critically at the foundations of mathematics. Although our present "Cantorian" mathematics is highly successful in its treatment of abstractions, one must not overlook the fact that from the very beginning the use of infinite processes was regarded with suspicion by many people.”
Paul Cohen (1934–2007) first seen 1966 wikiquote, CC BY-SA 4.0 source
Recorded in: Set theory and the continuum hypothesis, p. 1. Courier Corporation, 2008 (Dover reprint of 1966 1st edition published by W.A. Benjamin).
“When the Löwenheim-Skolem theorem is applied to particular formal systems, we obtain as special cases: Every group, field, ordered field, etc., has a countable subsystem of the same type. A more spectacular result follows from applying the theorem to set theory (a system which we shall later formalize): There is a countable collection of sets, such that if restrict the membership relation to these sets alone, they form a model for set theory (more precisely all the true statements of set theory are true in this model). In particular, within this model which we may denote by M, there must be an uncountable set. This paradox, that a countable model can contain an uncountable set, is explained by noting that to say a set is uncountable merely asserts the nonexistence of a one-one mapping of the set with the set of integers. The "uncountable" set in M set actually has only countably many members in M, but there is no one-one correspondence \underline {within} M of this set with the set of integers.”
Paul Cohen (1934–2007) said by 2007 at the latest wikiquote, CC BY-SA 4.0 source